/*++ Copyright (c) 2015 Microsoft Corporation --*/ #include "tactic/arith/arith_bounds_tactic.h" #include "ast/arith_decl_plugin.h" struct arith_bounds_tactic : public tactic { ast_manager& m; arith_util a; arith_bounds_tactic(ast_manager& m): m(m), a(m) { } ast_manager& get_manager() { return m; } void operator()(/* in */ goal_ref const & in, /* out */ goal_ref_buffer & result) override { bounds_arith_subsumption(in, result); } tactic* translate(ast_manager & mgr) override { return alloc(arith_bounds_tactic, mgr); } void checkpoint() { tactic::checkpoint(m); } struct info { rational r; unsigned idx; bool is_strict;}; /** \brief Basic arithmetic subsumption simplification based on bounds. */ void mk_proof(proof_ref& pr, goal_ref const& s, unsigned i, unsigned j) { if (s->proofs_enabled()) { proof* th_lemma = m.mk_th_lemma(a.get_family_id(), m.mk_implies(s->form(i), s->form(j)), 0, nullptr); pr = m.mk_modus_ponens(s->pr(i), th_lemma); } } bool is_le_or_lt(expr* e, expr*& e1, expr*& e2, bool& is_strict) { bool is_negated = m.is_not(e, e); if ((!is_negated && (a.is_le(e, e1, e2) || a.is_ge(e, e2, e1))) || (is_negated && (a.is_lt(e, e2, e1) || a.is_gt(e, e1, e2)))) { is_strict = false; return true; } if ((!is_negated && (a.is_lt(e, e1, e2) || a.is_gt(e, e2, e1))) || (is_negated && (a.is_le(e, e2, e1) || a.is_ge(e, e1, e2)))) { is_strict = true; return true; } return false; } void bounds_arith_subsumption(goal_ref const& g, goal_ref_buffer& result) { info inf; rational r; goal_ref s(g); // initialize result. obj_map lower, upper; expr* e1, *e2; TRACE("arith_subsumption", s->display(tout); ); for (unsigned i = 0; i < s->size(); ++i) { checkpoint(); expr* lemma = s->form(i); bool is_strict = false; bool is_lower = false; if (!is_le_or_lt(lemma, e1, e2, is_strict)) { continue; } // e1 <= e2 or e1 < e2 if (a.is_numeral(e2, r)) { is_lower = true; } else if (a.is_numeral(e1, r)) { is_lower = false; } else { continue; } proof_ref new_pr(m); if (is_lower && upper.find(e1, inf)) { if (inf.r > r || (inf.r == r && is_strict && !inf.is_strict)) { mk_proof(new_pr, s, i, inf.idx); s->update(inf.idx, m.mk_true(), new_pr); inf.r = r; inf.is_strict = is_strict; inf.idx = i; upper.insert(e1, inf); } else { mk_proof(new_pr, s, inf.idx, i); s->update(i, m.mk_true(), new_pr); } } else if (is_lower) { inf.r = r; inf.is_strict = is_strict; inf.idx = i; upper.insert(e1, inf); } else if (!is_lower && lower.find(e2, inf)) { if (inf.r < r || (inf.r == r && is_strict && !inf.is_strict)) { mk_proof(new_pr, s, i, inf.idx); s->update(inf.idx, m.mk_true(), new_pr); inf.r = r; inf.is_strict = is_strict; inf.idx = i; lower.insert(e2, inf); } else { mk_proof(new_pr, s, inf.idx, i); s->update(i, m.mk_true()); } } else if (!is_lower) { inf.r = r; inf.is_strict = is_strict; inf.idx = i; lower.insert(e2, inf); } } s->elim_true(); result.push_back(s.get()); TRACE("arith_subsumption", s->display(tout); ); } void cleanup() override {} }; tactic * mk_arith_bounds_tactic(ast_manager & m, params_ref const & p) { return alloc(arith_bounds_tactic, m); }